WE MAKE NO APOLOGIES to reprinting the following which we received from Martin Webster via another Nationalist. It gives a relevant and novel view with many new ideas regarding the morass created by the shenanigans of Mr. Griffin and his real or apparent climb down to the ZOG persecution system – read away and see what YOU think!

Responses to Gri££in's surrender
to the Equalities Commission

Dear All,
Firstly, may I ask that readers forward to their lists, or post with any forums or blogs with which they support, this bulletin and the bulletin I issued yesterday on the subject of Nick Gri££in's surrender to the Equalities Commission. I have never before issued bulletins on two consecutive days, but the issue at hand is crucial.

A veteran nationalist who I have known for 47 years has responded to my ELC "Small Circulation Bulletin" of yesterday headed "Gri££in responds to the Establishment's 'Stick and Carrot' management" by e-mailing me as follows:

From: [deleted]
To: Martin Webster
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 5:35 PM
Subject: Gri££in

Martin,

I didn't know that he had "done a deal" but I wondered how he was going to handle it.

In my view no court in the country would defend a situation where a political party had to recruit people who were opposed to or did not support that party's stated policies.

I suppose that if there were Jews, or Blacks who claimed to believe in the BNP's racial policies, (if it still has them,) then they could join but only if they publicly advocated repatriation and undertook, as a condition of membership, to be the first to volunteer for it.

Be interesting to see who would want to join under those terms but it would be in line with that party's stated policies, especially if that fact was widely advertised to the membership and general public, wouldn't it? Or is this just me being too clever by half?

D.
-------

My thoughts exactly. When I was approached by at the end of June by a Surrey BNP branch organiser for my views about this threat of litigation against the BNP by the Equality Board, I responded with an e-mail which I run out below as "Appendix". Beyond that, in the light of latest information, I observe:

1) The Nationalist Movement Was Established To Fight, Not to Surrender:

The Nationalist movement was set up to fight against the political and legal impositions of the multi-racialists, not to surrender to them at the first challenge.

The first prosecution against Nationalists under the first (1967) version of the Race Relations Act was DEFEATED because those involved in the production and distribution of 'Sussex News' had the courage to stand and fight and were willing to mobilise themselves and the movement to find the funds to pay for a first class lawyer.

The lady Suffragettes of the late 19th century, in their ultimately successful battle for 'Votes for Women", showed much greater courage, in the face of much greater adversity, than Gri££in is showing. You can't win battles if you don't fight them.

2) The Equality Board's Proposed Legal Action Is Far From Certain Of Success:

The proposed litigation against the BNP by the Equalities Commission is far from certain of victory.

At the core of this matter is the suggestion that a political party may not have a policy which opposes multi-racialism, may not organise itself to advance that policy and to protect its security but on the contrary, must admit persons of other races, who have an obvious vested interest in opposing the policy and who, if allowed to join in great enough numbers, would have the power not only to revoke the founding fundamental belief which brought the party into existence but also to inflict other malicious mischief designed to disintegrate the party and thereby prevent its original members from being able to organise to advance their point of view through a political party.

I do not believe that the courts would hold that a political party must regulate its membership in such a way as to facilitate the admission of persons whose likely intention was to extinguish the party's core beliefs which are not in themselves illegal.

Such a proposition is a clear subversion of democracy. The purpose of a democracy is to allow contending ideas advanced by contending parties to place their ideological wares before the electorate. There is no racial discrimination at the ballot box. Nobody is forced to join any political party. Everybody is free to set up their own political party to advance the views which they hold to be correct.

Thus nobody faces exclusion from the democratic process or political life if they belong to a category of person which is excluded by any particular party. They can join an established party which does not exclude them or, if none of those appeal, they can form their own party. In a sense, the whole of politics is about "discrimination".

3) For Gri££in, It's Not About Principle, but about MONEY

The real reason why Gri££in has decided to surrender is because it would need the BNP to mobilise its finances to fight a great and historic legal battle, in the same way that the National Front did in 1967 to pay for the successful defence of the 'Sussex News' defendants. The NF's founding chairman A.K. Chesterton MC, in addition to appealing to NF members and readers of his magazine 'Candour' for funds, dug deeply into his own pockets.

Part of any funds mobilisation that the BNP would be required to make would necessarily involve Gri££in in showing a lead, as Chesterton did, by devoting some of his very large personal income as a member of the European Parliament (and a part of Andrew Brons' MEP income too!) to that fight.

Perhaps he and Brons could use part of their MEP "expenses" -- as distinct from their salaries -- as well. (They might even try putting down the entire cost of instructing lawyers to fight the case on to their "expenses" as a necessary expenditure. It's worth a punt!)

But Gri££in won't hear of any scheme which would involve HIM in having to dig deep into HIS now lavish income because ultimately he's in politics for THE MONEY, not for any Cause.

He has changed his ideological position and his organisational adherence far too frequently over the years for him to claim that he has any fundamental ideological principle. His record shows that the only "cause" to which he has devoted himself is his own personal career and private enrichment.

Evidence of his cynical greed was seen in a bulletin he issued to his members on 2nd September with appeals for cash (repeated with hyperlinks in every paragraph!) to help fund the battle against the Equalities Commission when he had already made up his mind to surrender to its demands!

A subscriber to that bulletin kindly clicked on the hyperlink marked "Send this to a friend", and so I got it. (Thanks, friend, whoever you are!)

See:
> From: Chairman Nick Griffin M.E.P
> To:
> Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:31 AM
> Subject: Equalities Commission Showdown Starts Today!

Anybody who would like the text of this cynical confidence trickster's appeal has only to e-mail me and request the same.

Gri££in himself dug the hole into which the BNP has been pushed by the Equalities Commission.

Don't forget, when on the BBC Radio 4 'Today' programme in September 2003 Gri££in said:.......

* The repatriation of Coloured Immigrants was "unfeasible and inhumane";
* Certain ethnic aliens -- West Indians, Africans and Indians (as long as they were Hindu or Sikh -- but not Muslim) would be welcome to stay;
* "We can put up with a little salt in the soup"

.........he abandoned the fight to restore "Britain for the British".

I cited the exact details of this BBC interview in ELC a few years ago. But the BNP membership snored on.

Then he promoted half-Turks, in Greenwich and in Yorkshire, to stand as candidates. I drew attention to this in ELC. But the membership snored on.

Then, of course, he exulted when the Richardson Jews became BNP councillors. I commented on this in ELC. But the membership snored on.

Why did these alien anti-British nationalist lawyers of the Equalities Commission think that the BNP will buckle under their threatened legal action?

Because of the progressively multi-racial dance being led by Gri££in, because they rightly surmised that he is money-mad and would not be prepared to expend his Euro-cash on fighting to keep the BNP a white Britons' party -- or Britain a white peoples' country.

So the Equalities Commission knew that they were pushing on an open door. Gri££in only put his shoulder against it for a few moments for display purposes so as to con his stupid-dolt-ignoramus and/or cowardly followers to cough up a bit more cash.

This legal action could have had one good effect. It could have prompted the those among the BNP membership who are not totally brain-dead and/or minus a spine to ask themselves -- and to decide:

"Are we a party of White Britons or are we merely a multi-racial Populist party whose sole purpose is providing cash for the con-man Nick Griffin and his coterie of hangers-on?"

As ever: regards to my friends -- and a murrain on my enemies.

Martin Webster.

P.S.: I have also had a reaction from the author and businessman Ian Henshall whose "Crisis Newsletter" prompted by bulletin of yesterday:

From: Ian Henshall
To: Martin Webster
Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Gri££in responds to Stick & Carrot management

Dear Mr Webster,

I didn't take you off my list, I just don't send much out nowadays. I have no problem with you criticising me, I got some useful information from your newsletter, the link to the Telegraph about Israel's office in the BBC was extremely interesting.

I have no idea what your overall political perspective is nowadays, but on the Israel question, where you took issue, I am in the camp that says that although the government of Israel uses its influence highly effectively in many ways and often emotionally blackmails Jewish people into helping them, ultimately they act in the service of Washington and London.

I would concede that I cannot prove this as all important decisions within the elite are taken in secret, so I assume we will never agree.

Ian Henshall
--------

Let's hope Mr. Henshall gets back to more frequent bulletins (in which there was always much useful information) so that however much we may disagree on certain points, there is a mutually useful exchange of facts.
====================

Appendix:

From: Martin Webster
To: [deleted]
Cc: [deleted]
Bcc: [deleted]
Date: Saturday, June 27, 2009 7:07 PM

 

Subject: Law case for force BNP to take Black/Asian members

Dear P,

I don't see how the Race Act can compel people who have formed a club to serve the interests of a particular category of people, and whose membership has been restricted to that particular category of people, to accept into membership other categories of people who cannot, by definition, share the same interests or objectives as the founding membership for whom the club was set up in the first place. That would seem to be to conflict with a "right of association".

As you suggest, will they force the "Ulster 'Kick the Pope!' Flute-Playing Brotherhood" to admit into membership Roman Catholics, even those who proclaim membership of "Opus Dei" or "Friends of the Inquisition"?

I seem to remember that attempts by white police officers to join the "Black Police Association" were rejected by the leadership and membership of the association. Further, I recollect that the top cops of Scotland Yard and the Home Office let it be known that it would be a very bad career move for any white police officers to follow up the idea of forming a White Police Association. So this whole area (as you know) is a confusion of humbug, hypocrisy, inverted-racialism and political intimidation.

How would the "Black Police Association", "the Southall Indian Workers' Association" and myriad other such associations fare if political parties formed by people who belong to the indigenous ethnic stock of the British Isles ("the ethnic British") for the purpose of serving the interests of the ethnic British were compelled to accept into membership persons from other ethnic groups? The law would have to apply to all unincorporated associations, unless by act of Parliament, political parties contesting for public office were specifically brought into the remit of race relations legislation.

If Parliament passed such a law it would in effect be the state announcing that citizens can only form a political parties if those parties have policies are in accordance with the political objectives of the parties currently in parliament. That would seem to be to be a fundamental contradiction of democracy and of human rights which I don't think would be upheld in the higher British courts and/or such European or international courts to which we have access.

I think this proposal has been dreamed up not such much because its proponents have any realistic hope of getting their case accepted ultimately, but because they know that such a case would have to be fought up through various levels of the High Court, perhaps to the House of Lords, and perhaps onwards to the European Court of Human Rights or wherever else. This would cost a lot of cash and, thus, absorb the cash money Gri££in hopes to conjure out of the European Parliament. That, I think, is the name of the game. The Equalities Commission has access to endless state and cash.

I would have thought that compliance with the aims and objectives of a party would be a party's best defence in the event that it was found to be unlawful (or at some later date, legislated to be unlawful) to restrict the membership of political parties on ethnic grounds.

If at an AGM the membership were to amend the party's constitution along the following lines (I am not a lawyer, so I do not have an exact wording worked out) then the following might prove to be the party's best defence. I find it hard to believe that the courts and/or parliament would feel they had the power to prescribe political parties' policies or aims and objectives. That would be contradictory to the purpose of multi-party democracies.:

"Persons whose ancestry is not wholly of the indigenous ethnic stock of the British Isles or of kindred European ethnic origin may secure membership of the party providing:

"(a) they sign an undertaking that they will within 12 months of joining the party voluntarily remove themselves from the United Kingdom on a permanent basis and resettle themselves in the homeland of their ethnic forebears or, in the event of their ethnic forbears being of differing, mixed or confused ethnic ancestry, to any other state of their choice that will receive them as a resident;

"(b) renounce all claims on the British exchequer other than such contributory pension rights as they may have accrued;

"Full compliance with these terms shall be a necessary condition of membership of the party. Such persons as comply with these terms shall upon their departure from the United Kingdom be granted 'Associate Member' status within the party. Such persons as fail to comply with these terms, for no matter what reason, shall be removed from membership of the party and all rights which pertain thereto and no further application for membership of the party from them will be entertained under any circumstances."

INFILTRATORS OF THE NATIONAL MOVEMENT

(Below is the text of a letter which accompanies a detailed questionnaire which is sent out to anyone in the National Movement who lets Searchlies think they are willing to sell information to them – we have the full form too, but not the space to reprint it)

 Contact Questionnaire
Dear ******,
We would like to thank you for all your help and invite you to be of future assistance but in a organised way, that might suit you as well as us.
This might mean a night a week and maybe sometimes part of your weekends.
There are some people who you and I am in touch with and trust 100% who would like to meet with you in the next three to four weeks face to face for a meeting at which things could be discussed in fine detail with you to sort out some kind of deal / agreement.
If we could meet up with you in London then it would be more secure for all concerned than your home area – in ******** there would be the chance of somebody seeing you. You would have to be prepared to spend maybe four to six hours with the person you meet. All expenses and a meal would be covered. (And that is just a beginning of what Searchlies with its bottomless funding from British Zionism, fake charity status and Media money can dole out to potential renegades)
Honesty and frankness is the firm basis on which we do business. You would not be insulted about the views you hold. You could see this as going a long way to wiping the slate clean.
Why do we ask you these questions, sometimes personal? Because we are serious, professional and need to know about you if we are to trust you to the extent we need to.

Searchlight

SEARCHLIGHT is a nasty, evil set-up. It must be challenged and exposed for what it is – a magazine fronting a set of people (who in the past have included outright criminals like the late gangster Harry Bidney), determined to smash White Nationalism at all costs and with unlimited funds. It saddens us to know some Nationalists subscribe to this filth and we would ask all true White Nationalists not to buy, subscribe or read this anti-British trash. We recommend National Front News readers to the excellent NEW TARGET magazine which supports victims of Searchlies campaign of lies, half-truths and unfounded allegations.

Some facts on Searchlights criminal background:-

Searchlight’s Criminal and Violent Record

* In November 1963, Gerry Gable was arrested and held at Hornsey police station following a break-in at the flat of the historian David Irving.

After stealing GPO identity documents, the Communist Party member Gable and his comrade Manny Carpel, burgled Irving’s house hoping to find “evidence” that Irving was a “Nazi.’

Of course, they found nothing, and instead were arrested for their troubles. On January 14, 1964, Gable pleaded guilty to breaking into the flat with intent to steal, and was convicted.

* Carpel was also arrested in 1963 for assaulting P.C. William Nield and of having an offensive weapon (a metal butcher's hook).

* In 1967, Carpel pleaded guilty, with Michael Cohen, of trying to break into a printing works (W.H. Jones Ltd. on 20th July, 1966) with intent to commit a felony and to possessing housebreaking tools by night.

* Later, when in court for setting light to a print works in Uckfield, Sussex, and causing more than £50,000 worth of damage (November the 5th, 1980) he described himself as "a freelance journalist working for Searchlight."

* In December 1976, Searchlight was described by a stipendiary magistrate, Mr. John Milward, as "scurrilous and disreputable ... What purpose can there be in advertising opponents' meetings except for the purpose of identifying them and creating disorder and violence? This seems to be an attempt to stir up trouble which is to be very strongly deprecated." - Birmingham Post 31/12/76

…and we saw at the last election Searchlight’s financing of the huge “Hope Not Hate” campaign! Make no mistake – Searchlight is a media/state funded conspiracy to smash White Nationalism.

NATIONAL FRONT WEBSITES AND SUPPORT BLOGS
Main Site - www.national-front.org.uk
NF North - www.nationalfrontnorth.com – site now completely revamped

The British Nationalist – Main NF Support Blog - http://britnationalist.blogspot.com
National Front Forum - HERE
National Front London - http://www.londonnationalfront.org.uk
National Front Swindon - http://swindonnf.blogspot.com
National Front Ulster Blog - http://www.ulsternationalfront.blogspot.com
National Front Ulster Site - http://ulsternationalfront.t83.net
National Front Yorkshire Website - http://westyorksnf.synthasite.com
Young National Front Website - http://www.ynf.org.uk

NEWCASTLE NF DEMO IN SEPTEMBER
We do not have many details of this at the moment but if you are interested in getting along then ring
07017 410522 for details.

NEWS FROM SWINDON NF
The National Front has seen a lot of re-organising over the last few months. We have seen a brand new website, new units popping up all over Britain, a weekly newsletter from NF News, demonstrations which have received a huge amount of publicity (Reading), and just a general upsurge in activity across the country.

 However, the NF does have a lot of work if we are to secure the future of our people and a future for white children. The Northern National Front has worked tirelessly to forge unity among the numerous NF regional units up North. That is where we down in the south of England are going wrong. We have little co-operation and need to start acting together.

To win this struggle we need to be unified, and have mutual co-operation among the regional units.

To this end, we will be having a meeting in the South of England which will be dedicated to forging a bond between organisers and activists. There will be speeches, discussion, a table-top stall, beverages, etc. This meeting will give everyone a chance to voice their opinion on numerous issues.

Many may feel that this is unneeded, which in some respects is true. I personally have a good relationship with many organisers. However, this is about more than just making friends; it’s about sharing ideas, opinions, and most importantly about becoming united.

Obviously, this meeting isn't only reserved for members and activists in the south of England- anyone who is interested can attend.

The date for this meeting is not yet been decided on, yet I can confirm that it will be in December, and in the Wiltshire area.

Please contact me if you are interested in attending-  07890802883 or email swindonnf@yahoo.co.uk

Racial Regards

Michael

NF Bradford Meeting

NF MEETING BRADFORD SEPTEMBER 13^th 2009
Bradford National Front has secured a great venue for their September meetings. It will be in early September with a provisionally guest speaker the world renowned White Nationalist Dr. Tom Sunic. Dr. Sunic is a former US professor in political science; Date for this meeting is Sunday 13^th September). Dr. Sunic’s personal website can be found HERE Tel: Yorkshire NF on 07704703489

NF Activities – NF meetings, demos and leaflet drives are taking place all the time and in all parts of the country. For a full literature pack visit HERE and fill in the online enquiry form.

BRITAIN FIRST No.4
The September edition is now available. This is a four page tabloid style newspaper produced by Yorkshire National Front. For a copy send a sae and a small donation (if possible) to PO Box 282,
Leeds LS16 OEA. (Leave make cheques/PO’s to “Britain First”) We urgently need to expand “Britain First” to six/eight pages as a start but need donations URGENTLY to help us do this. Bulk rates are available £3 for 10 or £5 for 20, postage free.

NATIONAL FRONT REMEMBRANCE DAY

This will most likely be held on the 08^th November. As we go to press we are awaiting confirmation from NF HQ. Last year nearly 300 Nationalists marched to the Cenotaph. We want to make it the biggest march for many years this year so put it in your diary now.

National Front News is produced by the National Publicity Department of the NF. Copyright 2009. NF News may be reprinted as long as no part is altered and the whole publication is reproduced in total.

NF News can be contacted at nfnews@ntlworld.com Editor – Nice Guy Eddy.

To subscribe send Email with word “Subscribe Me Now!” as the heading. To unsubscribe send Email with unsubscribe as heading.